Excavations


... nothing is more essential to public interest than the preservation of public liberty.

- David Hume



Showing posts with label Legault. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Legault. Show all posts

Saturday, May 18, 2019

Locke to Quebec on “toleration” (ii)

And if the example of old Rome (where so many different opinions, gods and ways of worship were promiscuously tolerated) be of any weight, we have reason to imagine that no religion can be suspected to the state of ill intention to it, till the government first by partial usage of them, different from that of the rest of the subjects, declare its ill intentions to its professors, and so make a state business of it.  And if any rational man can imagine that force and compulsion can at any time be the right way to get an opinion or religion out of the world, or to break a party of men that unite in the profession of it, this I dare affirm: that it is the worst, the last to be used, and with the greatest caution, for these reasons:

(1)    Because it brings that upon a man which, that he might be freed from is the only reason why he is member of the commonwealth, viz., violence.  For, were there no fear of violence, there would be no government in the world, nor any need of it.

(2)    Because the magistrate, in using force, does in part cross what he pretends to do, which is the safety of all.  For, the preservation, as much as possible, of the property, quiet, and life of every individual being his duty, he is obliged not to disturb or destroy some for the quiet and safety of the rest, till it hath been tried whether there be not ways to save all.  For, so far as he undoes or destroys the safety of any of his subjects for the security of the rest, so far as he opposes his own design, which is professed, and ought to be only for preservation, to which even the meanest have a title. ‘Twould be but an uncharitable as well as unskillful way of a cure, and such as nobody would use or consent to, to cut off so much as an ulcered toe, though tending to a gangrene, till other gentler remedies have proved unsuccessful, though it be a part as low as the earth and far distant from the head.[1]

Locke, “An Essay on Toleration” (1667)  






[1] John Locke, Political Essays, ed. Mark Goldie (Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 149,150.

Locke to Quebec on “toleration” (i)


The other thing that hath just claim to an unlimited toleration is the place, time, and manner of worshipping my God.  Because this is wholly between God and me, and of an eternal concernment, above the reach and extent of polities and government, which are for my well-being in this world.  For the magistrate is but umpire between man and man; he can right me against my neighbor, but cannot defend me against my God; whatever evil I suffer by obeying him in other things, he can make me amends in this world, but if he force me to a wrong religion, he can make me no reparation in the other world.[1]

Locke, “An Essay on Toleration” (1667)



[1] John Locke, Political Essays, ed. Mark Goldie (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 137.

Thursday, May 16, 2019

Montaigne on Quebec’s Secularism Bill 21


A chaque pied son soulier.[1]

-          Montaigne, Essais (1588 edition), Book III, Ch. 13.




[1] This has been translated as “For every foot its own shoe” by Charles Cotton in 1685.  More recently Donald Frame’s translation is “For every foot its own shoe.” And M.A. Screech has it as “For every foot its proper shoe.”  I am indebted to Peter Burke’s concise work on Montaigne in the Oxford “Past Masters” series which brought my attention to the metaphor, and he translates it as: “Let every foot have its own shoe”. 

See: Les Essais (eds. P. Villeny and V-L. Saulnier), online edition by P. Desan, University of Chicago, p. 1066; Essays of Michel de Montaigne, tr. Charles Cotton, ed. William Hazlitt, Project Gutenberg;   The Complete Works, tr. Donald Frame (Toronto: Everyman’s Library, 2003), p. 994; The Complete Essays, tr. M.A. Screech (Toronto: Penguin, 2003), p. 1209; Peter Burke, Montaigne (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981), p. 33.