h/t David Parkins/The Globe and Mail
Published March 31, 2026
Joerge Dyrkton
Thoughts on Canadian Political Culture: Criticisms, Reviews and the Poverty of Parliament
Excavations
... nothing is more essential to public interest than the preservation of public liberty.
- David Hume
Wednesday, April 1, 2026
Tuesday, March 24, 2026
Tehran diary: dark and bitter, the terror of life under US-Israeli bombardment
It’s 5am on Thursday 12 March. I was finally falling asleep after a day full of fear when the phone rang. Terror rushes through me. It’s not the right time for a call. Someone must need help – or maybe they are alone and frightened.
I answer the phone, exhausted. It’s my younger sister.
She is crying and cannot speak. My heart breaks into a thousand pieces. I
haven’t seen her for many days. When I was released from prison, she had gone
to another city to take care of our mother.
She returned on her birthday. But then the war began, and
we remained separated in two different homes in Tehran.
She is much younger than me, yet she took on the
responsibility of protecting my son so that I could stay somewhere safe and
avoid being arrested again. I remind her how grateful I am. My heart is in
turmoil: I thought something terrible had happened at home and that she was
unable to say it.
I tell her that right now the only thing that matters is
staying alive, even if we no longer have a home.
Through her sobs she says: “Our neighbour was caught in
the blast wave … and he’s gone.”
For a moment I picture our neighbour. Like me, he smoked
cigarettes. He must have been on the balcony for a smoke. Or maybe, like many
others, he had gone out to watch the drones and see which direction they were
flying.
Maybe he had gone there to cry for a country and a people
being destroyed. Maybe he was thinking about where to find gasoline so he could
take his two children to a safer city.
I wish I were in a desert where I could scream. Where I
could cry as loudly as I want. The last time I cried was after the massacres of
protesters in January. Why is it that here, unlike everywhere else in the
world, we cannot cry like ordinary people? Why have we suffered so much that
even new pain no longer shakes us?
I can’t sleep any more. I go to the place where I have
put a small gas burner – what I call my kitchen. I want coffee, but coffee has
become very expensive and I have to save money. Cigarettes are also expensive,
but I smoke anyway: one, two, five …
Ever since the fuel depots were bombed at the weekend, my
chest has burned and I can barely breathe. I bought an inhaler that now hangs
around my neck.
At 6.30am another loud explosion shakes the air. I look
out the window. Some supporters of the government have come into the streets in
their cars, chanting mourning songs and saying: “People, we are all together,
compatriots.”
Compatriots? Your foolishness destroyed this homeland. We
tried. We struggled so these days would never come. We were imprisoned,
tortured, executed.
I think about Donald Trump. If he had acted 50 days
earlier, 35,000 people might still be alive. Now I am afraid Iran will be
destroyed – and yet the Islamic republic will remain.
I am preparing to send a few packets of lentils and a
small amount of money to a woman whose husband is in prison and who has a small
child. It is the last banknote we have. There is no cash anywhere. I don’t know
if one day we will ever have enough money to rebuild this devastation.
It is now 8am. The streets are crowded again. People are
going about their business. I see several tired and hopeless men, day labourers
who still come here every day. But there is no work.
Life continues in Tehran. But it is dark and bitter.
Source: Elahi (a former political prisoner writing
under a pseudonym) as told to Deepa Parent, The Guardian, published
online Thu 12 Mar 2026 17.19 GMT
Sunday, March 8, 2026
Pete Hegseth’s problem with War Psychosis: “A very dangerous person”
Critics say brash, bombastic Fox News host out of his depth to guide US military through murky new Middle East conflict
Brash and bellicose, he sounded more like a cartoon bully
than a sombre statesman. “Death and destruction from the sky all day long,”
Pete Hegseth, wearing a red, white and and blue tie and pocket square, bragged
to reporters at the Pentagon near Washington. “This was never meant to be
a fair fight, and it is not a fair fight. We are punching them while they’re
down, which is exactly how it should be.”
Hegseth, 45, a former Fox News TV host who now commands the
world’s most powerful military, has this week become the face of Donald Trump’s
war in Iran. That has set off alarm bells for critics who warn that the
Secretary of Defense – pointedly rebranded “Secretary of War” – has rapidly
transformed the Pentagon into the staging ground for an ideological and
religious crusade.
With machismo, Christian nationalism and callousness toward
the lives of US troops, they say, Hegseth’s puerile displays on TV are aimed at
sating Trump’s desire for a warmonger worthy of the manosphere. This was
reinforced by a lurid social media video that intersperses clips from
Hollywood blockbusters such as Braveheart, Gladiator, Superman and Top Gun with
Hegseth and real kill-shot footage of the attacks in Iran.
Janessa Goldbeck, chief executive of Vet Voice Foundation, a
nonprofit advocacy organisation, said: “Pete Hegseth is a very dangerous
person. He’s a white Christian nationalist and has the arsenal of the United
States government at his disposal and a permission slip from President Trump to
deploy carnage wherever he wishes against whomever he wishes.”
Hegseth’s rise would have been unthinkable under any other
commander-in-chief. Born in Minneapolis, he studied politics at Princeton
University and became publisher and editor of the Princeton Tory, a
conservative student journal, where he frequently waded into culture-war issues
such as feminism and homosexuality.
After leaving Princeton, Hegseth joined the US army national
guard as an infantry officer. His service included deployments to Guantánamo
Bay in Cuba and tours of Iraq and Afghanistan. He later Revealed in a book that
he told soldiers under his command in Iraq to ignore legal advice about when
they were permitted to kill enemy combatants under their rules of engagement.
Hegseth became chief executive of Concerned Veterans for
America, a conservative advocacy group, but departed in 2016 amid
allegations of financial mismanagement, sexual impropriety and personal
misconduct.
In 2018 Hegseth’s mother, Penelope, sent him an email that
said: “You are an abuser of women – that is the ugly truth and I have no
respect for any man that belittles, lies, cheats, sleeps around, and uses women
for his own power and ego. You are that man (and have been for years) and as
your mother, it pains me and embarrasses me to say that, but it is the sad, sad
truth.”
Hegseth subsequently became a familiar face on TV as a
contributor and co-host of Fox & Friends on Fox News, frequently
interviewing Trump and defending his policies. He once wrote that, in the event
of a Democratic election win, “the military and police … will be forced to make
a choice” and “Yes, there will be some form of civil war”.
But Trump prevailed in 2024 and nominated Hegseth to serve
as secretary of defence. At his confirmation hearing, senators raised serious
questions about his record: disparaging remarks about women serving in the
armed forces; allegations that he drank while on duty; claims of sexual assault
and misconduct; his troubled tenure running two small veterans’ nonprofit
organisations; and his lack of experience for a post overseeing the world’s
most powerful military.
The Senate ultimately split 50–50, forcing the
vice-president, JD Vance, to cast the tie-breaking vote. As defence secretary
Hegseth has vowed to “unleash overwhelming and punishing violence” on enemies
and promised to dispense with “stupid rules of engagement” – rules designed to
restrict attacks on civilian populations.
Now, in his first week guiding the nation through a murky
new Middle East conflict, Hegseth has largely forgone the solemnity of a
traditional defence secretary in favour of the performative antics of a
partisan broadcaster revelling in America’s capacity to inflict violence.
For years he had cultivated a hypermasculine “muscleman”
aesthetic designed to play to Trump’s sensibilities and the rightwing media
ecosystem. Now, faced with a geopolitical crisis that demands nuance and
strategic foresight, he appears to many to be out of his depth.
Goldbeck, a Marine Corps veteran who was deployed overseas
as a combat engineer officer, commented: “I wish I could say how cavalier,
obtuse and hopeless Secretary Hegseth is at leading the Pentagon. I can’t even
muster the words to describe his self-adulation, matched only in scope by his
apparent moral depravity.”
She added: “Let’s not forget that Pete Hegseth is a
former morning-show Fox News TV host, and has this cartoonish persona, speaking
what he thinks is tough-guy language, but sounds to me as a veteran and to many
of my peers who served in combat like somebody who is completely inept and
pretending to have this macho persona.
“Honestly, it’s embarrassing. We know this guy is
incompetent. I wouldn’t feel safe leaving Pete Hegseth in charge of putting
together a DoorDash order.”
Former White House officials share the concerns. Brett Bruen, president of the public
affairs agency Global Situation Room and former global engagement director of
the Barack Obama administration, said: “Hegseth is ill-suited for the kind of
reassurance and strategy that Americans and our allies need to hear from the
Pentagon right now.
“They don’t need a bumper sticker. They don’t need the
bravado and the brashness that he brings. They need to know that America’s
military is in strong, stable hands and what we have seen in his first couple
of war press conferences is an inability to move beyond this Fox personality
and into the role of leader of our nation’s military at a time of war.”
During his Pentagon briefing on the war on Wednesday,
Hegseth adopted a bombastic tone, saying of Iranian leaders: “They are toast
and they know it. Or at least soon enough they will know it. America is winning
– decisively, devastatingly and without mercy.”
He bashed “fake news” while addressing the six army
reservists killed in an Iranian attack on an operations center in Kuwait. “When
a few drones get through or tragic things happen, it’s front-page news. I get
it. The press only wants to make the president look bad. But try for once to
report the reality. The terms of this war will be set by us at every step.”
The comments provoked uproar for their lack of empathy for
America’s fallen. Jeremy Varon, a history professor at the New School for
Social Research in New York, said: “That’s outrageous. You have a national
effort by all media regardless of partisan bent to memorialise and honour the
dead and he sees that simply as a tactic to bring down Trump.”
There was another aspect of Hegseth’s personality barely
addressed by the Senate: his sympathy for Christian nationalism. Photos have
shown him bearing two tattoos associated with crusader imagery. One depicts the
Jerusalem cross – a cluster of five crosses long connected to medieval crusader
iconography – on his chest.
Nearby is an image of a sword accompanied by the Latin
phrase “Deus vult”, meaning “God wills it”, a slogan historically linked to the
crusades and revived in recent years by various far-right groups. It appeared
on clothing and flags carried by some participants in the January 6 Capitol
attack.
Nor are the references merely symbolic. In his 2020 book,
American Crusade, Hegseth wrote that those who benefit from “western
civilisation” should “thank a crusader”. The book suggests that democratic
politics alone may not suffice to achieve the goals of his political allies,
declaring: “Voting is a weapon, but it’s not enough. We don’t want to fight,
but, like our fellow Christians one thousand years ago, we must.”
There have been reports of more troubling behaviour. The New
Yorker reported that a colleague at Concerned Veterans for America
complained that he and another man repeatedly shouted “Kill all Muslims!”
during a drunken episode at a bar while travelling for work.
Hegseth has previously endorsed the doctrine of “sphere
sovereignty”, a worldview derived from the extremist beliefs of Christian
reconstructionism (CR). The philosophy calls for capital punishment for
homosexuality and strictly patriarchal families and churches.
The defence secretary attends Pilgrim Hill Reformed
Fellowship, a church linked to the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches,
a denomination co-founded by the pastor Doug Wilson, who has openly advocated a
theocratic vision of society in which wives should submit to their husbands and
women should be denied the vote. Wilson recently led a worship serivce’; at the
Pentagon at Hegseth’s invitation.
Robert P Jones, president and founder of Public Religion
Research Institute thinktank in Washington, said: “This is not one or two
comments. It’s not a kind of one-off behaviour. This is like a longstanding
publicly demonstrated orientation that Hegseth has. It’s not just a
glorification of violence but a glorification of violence in the name of
Christianity and civilisation.”
The Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) says it has
received more than 200 complaints from service members about military
commanders invoking extremist Christian rhetoric about biblical “end times” to
justify involvement in the Iran war. Such language could also be offensive to
Arab allies and provide Iran with the fodder it needs to justify its own holy
war against the US.
Jones warned: “It casts this not as anything related to the
public – is it about a nuclear programme? Is it about sponsoring terrorism? –
which are legitimate political concerns. It takes it out of the realm of
politics and casts it as a holy war of a supposedly Christian nation against a
Muslim nation.”
Doug Pagitt, a pastor and executive director of the
progressive Christian group Vote Common Good, compares Hegseth’s worldview to
the historical heresy of Constantine, who allegedly painted a cross on his
shield to conquer in the name of God – a theology the broader Christian church
has spent centuries trying to distance itself from following the horrors of the
Crusades.
Pagitt said: “It seems to me that Pete Hegseth has a
worldview, which is contorted toward thinking that this administration has a
particular divine calling. He believes – because he said it – that God has
uniquely ordained Donald Trump and those that he chooses to accomplish very
specific purposes in the world.
“Pete Hegseth’s own version of Christianity is one that’s
built around a certain Christian advancement that comes through the domination
of the governments of nations. He believes that not only is the military at his
disposal to use for his purposes but it’s there to fulfill God’s agenda for the
world.”
Source: David Smith in The Gurdian, published online on Sun
8 Mar 2026 09.00 GMT
Originally published with the title: ‘A very dangerous person’: alarm
as Pete Hegseth revels in carnage of Iran war.
A Switch in Time
The following letter to the editor was sent to the Globe and Mail on 03 March. It was not published.
Re: Dark days ahead for B.C. – literally (Opinion, 03
Mar.)
Dear Editor,
As I see it, the underlying reason for British Columbia’s
upcoming switch to permanent Daylight Saving Time is clear as the light of day:
look to geopolitics. It is a direct
response to the march of war in Iran and the Middle East as brought on by the
USA and Israel. The terms Spring Forward
and Fall Back evoke manoeuvres from the First World War when DST became
widespread. So, premier David Eby may,
in part, be signalling NDP antimilitarism.
But what better way is there to indicate non-alignment with present-day
U.S. interests than by finding more time in common with things Canadian,
particularly as some Albertans consider sovereignty.
Joerge Dyrkton