Excavations


... nothing is more essential to public interest than the preservation of public liberty.

- David Hume



Monday, January 2, 2023

The Liberty Cap (appropriated by Trump?)

 

There were two early origins to the liberty cap: one Roman; and, the other from ancient Greece, or out of Turkey.  Either round or peaked, but mostly the latter, the Roman version was made of a kind of felt and known as the pileus cap. It symbolized freedom from slavery, while also acting as a reminder of one’s former status. [1] The image of such a cap was even used on a coin by Brutus following the assassination of Julius Caesar.[2]

Another version, known as the Phrygian cap, has its roots in historical Greece and Asia Minor.  It can be identified by its peak, which is tipped over (pictured above).  Instead of acting as a symbol of freedom, it was originally used to identify “strangers” to the land, notably captives.[3]

The liberty cap in its various forms was prevalent during much of the American Revolution as a symbol of rebellion, but this dissipated over the nineteenth century as its portrayal of “liberty” ran counter to the compromising business of slavery in the South.[4]

By the time of the French Revolution, the image of the bent Phrygian cap merged with the tradition of freedom associated with the pileus cap to become a definitive, pervasive and lasting symbol of Gallic political fervor.[5]

It is interesting to note that the experience of the liberty cap in America did not recover following emancipation from slavery, but seems only to have been revived recently by Donald Trump’s political base – one not entirely sensitive to the historical errors of the U.S.A.

 



[1] Yvonne Korshak, “The Liberty Cap as a Revolutionary Symbol in America and France,” Smithsonian Studies in American Art, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Autumn 1987), p. 53.  See also Annelein de Dijn, Freedom: An Unruly History (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2020), p. 2 ff. 

[2] Korshak, “The Liberty Cap as a Revolutionary Symbol in America and France,” p. 53.

[3] Ibid., pp. 59,60.

[4] Ibid., p. 57.

[5] Ibid., p. 64.


No comments:

Post a Comment