Excavations


... nothing is more essential to public interest than the preservation of public liberty.

- David Hume



Friday, February 14, 2014

On Harper's "Fair" Elections Act (Bill C-23)

Bill C-23 requires that “citizens” produce (and, of course, pay for) government-issued photo ID in order to vote in the next federal erection election.  May I remind the reader (and the “Harper Government”) that the Robo-call affair was not about “citizens” casting multiple ballots. Given that our election day is fixed to September, students especially, along with seniors and other marginalized populations, will find themselves even more readily disenfranchised, assuming that some of these groups even wish to exercise their right to vote, a questionable matter these days. While also emasculating a so-called “bureaucracy,” headed by the Chief Electoral Officer (who acts in the public interest – a notion alien to right wing thinking), Harper is adding (though, in effect, not equally among us) a bureaucratic (and as I suggest - expensive) prerequisite to voting. Is this truly a Fair Elections Act when our rights are as such transformed?  

The truth of our beloved “Harper Government” emerges as each anti-democratic step follows another.  There is no need for confusion.   We are witnessing the corruption of Canadian democracy, first withered by small-minded ideologues now plotting to maintain every dark corner of electoral advantage in an effort to perpetuate power ad nauseam.

Saturday, February 8, 2014

On a Canadian Conundrum - and Cannabis

If a Canadian federal election were to be held today, which party would you vote for – the Conservatives, NDP, Liberals, Greens, or Bloc Québecois? Well, if I were to vote now I would choose none of the above.  It’s a Canadian conundrum - and a real problem for discerning voters, because our federal parties keep to uncompromising and untenable platforms.

As ruled by the “Harper Government,” Canada is so undemocratic that a vote for a Conservative candidate borders on constitutional treason – just look for instance to the hack job on the CBC, which is now bereft of its editorial independence.  We live in a country that no longer has freedom of the press for our national public broadcaster.  Who in their right mind wants to vote Conservative?

Then look to the Official Opposition NDP. Stacked by soft Quebec nationalists à la Mulroney, the NDP Party under “Tom” Mulcair hopes to dismantle the Chretien government’s “Clarity Act”, now widely regarded as a success story (or the only thing federalists have going for them).  For Mulcair, the formula “50% plus 1” is enough to dismantle Canada, should a referendum on separation in Quebec actually happen.   It sounds to me that the NDP are a profoundly disloyal opposition; they very much deserve to return to third party status for this reason alone, aside from their Peter Pan dream of eliminating the Senate.

How about the Liberals under Trudeau?  Recently bolstered by caucus evictions of Senate Liberals, Trudeau wants to escape the Conservative “not a leader” caricature of his predecessors Ignatieff and Dion.  But Trudeau is still floundering on his party’s national platform to legalize marijuana.  Too bad he did not bother to check out his mother Margaret’s autobiography, Changing My Mind, before he adopted this “liberal” policy.  Margaret Trudeau suffers from bipolar disorder, and for two or three decades she was “addicted” to pot, which contributed to her chronic episodes of “extreme mania”.[1] It was only when Margaret Trudeau stopped smoking pot on her doctor’s orders that she got better and came into her own.[2]

In other words, Justin Trudeau has learned absolutely nothing from his mother’s experiences, which makes him look foolish, and now his policy on pot will contribute to any number of mental health crises among the vulnerable, once there is legal access to marijuana.  It is also well documented that marijuana use is an early trigger for the onset of schizophrenia, especially among those who are susceptible to this serious and tragic illness.[3]  Legal pot is a way of dealing with foreign drug cartels, but schizophrenics become our domestic victims, and they don’t vote.  Both the Liberals and Greens advocate the legalization of pot; that they do so is indicative of their poor grasp of mental health matters.  Pity.  Pot is also much like a Brave New World solution, where people take its equivalent, soma, in order to get a “holiday from the facts.”[4]  Moreover, the legalization of pot represents post-colonialism at its worst: instead of the disgraceful nineteenth-century Opium Wars, it is now the West which seeks further amusement and distraction, while the Chinese economic engine climbs to ascendancy.

Having eliminated the Conservatives, NDP, Liberals and Greens, there is only the hapless Bloc Québecois, which is not represented outside of Quebec.  That leaves no party to vote for, but many reasons to stand on guard against this Canadian conundrum. Allow me to suggest a remedy:  stymied potential voters should be allowed a “veto” on each and every ballot in the next federal election.[5]  

Yes, an extra entry on each ballot to say “I deny” should be considered by Elections Canada to give people of conscience a chance to express their dissent at oppressive party platforms.  It is a good to declare independence from leaders deprived of foresight, as well as hindsight.





[1] Margaret Trudeau, Changing My Mind (Toronto: Harper Collins, 2010), p. 283.  Margaret Trudeau frequently describes herself in her memoirs as “addicted” to pot.
[2] Ibid., p. 240.
[3] For an introduction see, for example, David Suzuki’s CBC documentary “The Downside of High” on The Nature of Things.
[4] Aldous Huxley, Brave New World & Brave New World Revisited, intro by Margaret Atwood (Toronto: Vintage Canada, 2007), p. 224.
[5] Thanks to Wade, who probably watches too many Seinfeld episodes.

Friday, January 24, 2014

Harper in, on and with Israel: no nuance on Netanyahu

The following is an excerpt of Harper’s speech to the Knesset earlier this week.  Pay close attention to the last sentence quoted below.  Harper said that the old anti-Semitism ”has been translated into more sophisticated language for use in polite society.” In other words, if one is critical of Israeli policies the critic is an anti-Semite.  It is a form of “You’re either with us, or against us” binary thinking one finds in George Bush (the lesser) and in many other instances.[1]  It has its ancestral roots in The New Testament Bible, when Jesus says “He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters.” (Matthew, 12:30)  Likely the allusion was not lost on Harper’s immediate audience – and his vast entourage, including select voters at home.
Here is just what was said:
Unfortunately, ladies and gentlemen, we live in a world where that kind of moral relativism runs rampant.
And in the garden of such moral relativism, the seeds of much more sinister notions can be easily planted.
And so we have witnessed, in recent years, the mutation of the old disease of anti-Semitism and the emergence of a new strain.
We all know about the old anti-Semitism.
It was crude and ignorant, and it led to the horrors of the death camps.
Of course, in many dark corners, it is still with us.
But, in much of the Western world, the old hatred has been translated into more sophisticated language for use in polite society.[2]




[1] See Wikipedia “You’re either with us, or against us”
[2] http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/read-the-full-text-of-harpers-historic-speech-to-israels-knesset/article16406371/?page=2

Rob Ford and a "Brave New World" Thought

Forget the term “Ford nation” to depict Toronto Mayor Rob Ford’s loyal suburban constituents; let’s try instead “fordship” to pinpoint the cult of irresponsibility. Here is the character Bernard Marx in Brave New World reporting to Mustapha Mond, otherwise known as “your fordship”, a play on the name of Henry Ford, originator of the Model “T” (which, according to the story, has alphabetically replaced the the crucifix):

     ‘… I would like to take this opportunity of drawing your fordship’s attention to …’

     Mustapha Mond’s anger gave place almost at once to mirth.  The idea of this creature solemnly lecturing him – him – about the social order was really too grotesque.  The man must have gone mad. ‘I ought to give him a lesson,’ he said to himself; then threw back his head and laughed aloud.  For the moment, at any rate, the lesson would not be given.[1]




[1] Aldous Huxley, Brave New World & Brave New World Revisited, intro by Margaret Atwood (Toronto: Vintage, 2007), p. 152.  First published in 1932.

Thursday, January 23, 2014

January statistics 2014: Pageviews by country

Here is a brief summary of my blog pageviews by country as of January 23 at 1800 PST:

Canada                       8081

United States           6647

Germany                    629

Latvia                          411

United Kingdom     373

Ukraine                      338

France                        337

Japan                         217

Malaysia                   159



Monday, January 6, 2014

The PM and the Northern Gateway Pipeline


Stephen Harper (at the Vancouver Board of Trade): “It wouldn’t be B.C. without [protestors].”

Raymond Aron: “… politics will always remain the art of the irrevocable choice by fallible men in unforeseen circumstances and semi-ignorance.”[1]





[1]Raymond Aron, The Opium of the Intellectuals, intro by Harvey C. Mansfield, forward by Daniel J. Mahoney and Brian C. Anderson (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 2009), p. 199.  Originally published in 1955.

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Are you on the Conservatives Enemies' list?

The other day I received an unidentified letter in the mail warning in big bold letters (exactly as written) “Are you on the Conservatives Enemies’ list?” I opened it eagerly to find that it was from the NDP telling me, among other things, of a data base operated by the Conservatives.  I was heartened to learn that I am likely not alone on that data base.  But I was also bothered by the bad grammar.  The envelope should have read: “Are you on the Conservatives’ Enemies list?”  Apparently the federal NDP, while no longer socialist, still has problems with its possessives.