Excavations


... nothing is more essential to public interest than the preservation of public liberty.

- David Hume



Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Edward Gibbon on Donald Trump in American Election Debate No. 1


… that feeble prince was destitute of personal merit.[1]



[1] Edward Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Ed. and Abridged Hans-Friedrich Mueller (New York: The Modern Library, 2003), p. 359, (Chapter XIX).   It is worth noting that Gibbon began publishing his work in the same year as the American Declaration of Independence.

Friday, September 23, 2016

On Roman Torture

Given the current attention to Canada’s extradition treaty talks with China, and the apparent lack of the rule of law in that country – including high death penalty rates and claims of torture, it might be salutary to look at the basis of our own customs by peering into Roman history.  Below is an excerpt from Edward Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, written between 1776 and 1788.  Considered one of the greatest works of history ever written, Gibbon writes about torture in the context of his introductory chapter on Constantinople, capital city of the Eastern half of the Roman Empire (later known as the Byzantine Empire) established by Emperor Constantine, who claimed to convert to Christianity.

The annals of tyranny, from the reign of Tiberius to that of Domitian, circumstantially relate the executions of many innocent victims, but as long as the faintest remembrance was kept alive of the national freedom and honour, the last hours of a Roman were secured from the danger of ignominious torture.  The conduct of provincial magistrates was not, however, regulated by the practice of the city or the strict maxims of the civilians.  They found the use of torture established not only among the slaves of oriental despotism but among the Macedonians, who obeyed a limited monarch; among the Rhodians, who flourished by the liberty of commerce; and even among the sage Athenians, who had asserted and adorned the dignity of humankind.  The acquiescence of the provincials encouraged their governors to acquire, or perhaps to usurp, a discretionary power of employing the rack to extort from vagrants or plebeian criminals the confession of their guilt, till they insensibly proceeded to confound the distinction of rank and to disregard the privileges of Roman citizens.  The apprehensions of the subjects urged them to solicit, and the interest of the sovereign encouraged him to grant, a variety of special exemptions which tacitly allowed, and even authorized, the general use of torture.  They protected all persons of illustrious or honourable rank, bishops and their presbyters, professors of the liberal arts, soldiers and their families, municipal officers, and their posterity to the third generation, and all children under the age of puberty.  But a fatal maximum was introduced into the new jurisprudence of the empire that in the case of treason, which included every offense that the subtlety of lawyers could derive from a hostile intention towards the prince or republic, all privileges were suspended and all conditions were reduced to the same ignominious level.  As the safety of the emperor was avowedly preferred to every consideration of justice or humanity, the dignity of age and the tenderness of youth were alike exposed to the most cruel tortures, and the terrors of a malicious information which might select them as accomplices, or even as witnesses, perhaps, of an imaginary crime perpetually hung over the heads of the principal citizens of the Roman world.

These evils, however terrible they may appear, were confined to the smaller number of Roman subjects, whose dangerous situation was in some degree compensated by the enjoyment of those advantages, either of nature or of fortune, which exposed them to the jealousy of the monarch.  The obscure millions of a great empire have much less to dread from the cruelty than from the avarice of their masters, and their humble happiness is principally affected by the grievance of excessive taxes, which, gently pressing on the wealthy, descend with accelerated weight on the meaner and more indigent classes of society.[1]

*******************************************************************************


A people elated by pride or soured by discontent are seldom qualified to form a just estimate of their actual situation.  The subjects of Constantine were incapable of discerning the decline of genius and manly virtue which so far degraded them below the dignity of their ancestors; but they could feel and lament the rage of tyranny, the relaxation of discipline, and the increase of taxes.  The impartial historian who acknowledges the justice of their complaints will observe some favourable circumstances which tended to alleviate the misery of their condition.  The threatening tempest of Barbarians which so soon subverted the foundations of Roman greatness was still repelled, or suspended, on the frontiers.  The arts of luxury and literature were cultivated, and the elegant pleasures of society were enjoyed, by the inhabitants of a considerable portion of the globe.  The forms, the pomp, and the expense of the civil administration contributed to restrain the irregular license of the soldiers; and although the laws were violated by power or perverted by subtlety, the sage principles of Roman jurisprudence preserved a sense of order and equity unknown to the despotic governments to the East.  The rights of mankind might derive some protection from religion and philosophy; and the name of freedom, which could no longer alarm, might sometimes admonish, the successors of Augustus that they did not reign over a nation of Slaves or Barbarians. [2]







[1] Edward Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Ed. and Abridged Hans-Friedrich Mueller (New York: The Modern Library, 2003), p. 340-342. (Chapter XVII)
[2] Ibid., pp. 342,3

Monday, September 19, 2016

Word for the day: Sociopath

Sociopath: a person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme anti-social attitudes and behaviour, particularly a lack of moral responsibility or social conscience.


Source: The Canadian Oxford Dictionary (2001)