Excavations


... nothing is more essential to public interest than the preservation of public liberty.

- David Hume



Friday, January 24, 2014

Harper in, on and with Israel: no nuance on Netanyahu

The following is an excerpt of Harper’s speech to the Knesset earlier this week.  Pay close attention to the last sentence quoted below.  Harper said that the old anti-Semitism ”has been translated into more sophisticated language for use in polite society.” In other words, if one is critical of Israeli policies the critic is an anti-Semite.  It is a form of “You’re either with us, or against us” binary thinking one finds in George Bush (the lesser) and in many other instances.[1]  It has its ancestral roots in The New Testament Bible, when Jesus says “He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters.” (Matthew, 12:30)  Likely the allusion was not lost on Harper’s immediate audience – and his vast entourage, including select voters at home.
Here is just what was said:
Unfortunately, ladies and gentlemen, we live in a world where that kind of moral relativism runs rampant.
And in the garden of such moral relativism, the seeds of much more sinister notions can be easily planted.
And so we have witnessed, in recent years, the mutation of the old disease of anti-Semitism and the emergence of a new strain.
We all know about the old anti-Semitism.
It was crude and ignorant, and it led to the horrors of the death camps.
Of course, in many dark corners, it is still with us.
But, in much of the Western world, the old hatred has been translated into more sophisticated language for use in polite society.[2]




[1] See Wikipedia “You’re either with us, or against us”
[2] http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/read-the-full-text-of-harpers-historic-speech-to-israels-knesset/article16406371/?page=2

Rob Ford and a "Brave New World" Thought

Forget the term “Ford nation” to depict Toronto Mayor Rob Ford’s loyal suburban constituents; let’s try instead “fordship” to pinpoint the cult of irresponsibility. Here is the character Bernard Marx in Brave New World reporting to Mustapha Mond, otherwise known as “your fordship”, a play on the name of Henry Ford, originator of the Model “T” (which, according to the story, has alphabetically replaced the the crucifix):

     ‘… I would like to take this opportunity of drawing your fordship’s attention to …’

     Mustapha Mond’s anger gave place almost at once to mirth.  The idea of this creature solemnly lecturing him – him – about the social order was really too grotesque.  The man must have gone mad. ‘I ought to give him a lesson,’ he said to himself; then threw back his head and laughed aloud.  For the moment, at any rate, the lesson would not be given.[1]




[1] Aldous Huxley, Brave New World & Brave New World Revisited, intro by Margaret Atwood (Toronto: Vintage, 2007), p. 152.  First published in 1932.

Thursday, January 23, 2014

January statistics 2014: Pageviews by country

Here is a brief summary of my blog pageviews by country as of January 23 at 1800 PST:

Canada                       8081

United States           6647

Germany                    629

Latvia                          411

United Kingdom     373

Ukraine                      338

France                        337

Japan                         217

Malaysia                   159



Monday, January 6, 2014

The PM and the Northern Gateway Pipeline


Stephen Harper (at the Vancouver Board of Trade): “It wouldn’t be B.C. without [protestors].”

Raymond Aron: “… politics will always remain the art of the irrevocable choice by fallible men in unforeseen circumstances and semi-ignorance.”[1]





[1]Raymond Aron, The Opium of the Intellectuals, intro by Harvey C. Mansfield, forward by Daniel J. Mahoney and Brian C. Anderson (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 2009), p. 199.  Originally published in 1955.